Hey, Compliance Warriors and Bosses!
Recently, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has filed a lawsuit against Dallas Barber and Stylist College, Inc., alleging pregnancy discrimination in their hiring practices.
This case highlights the ongoing challenges pregnant women face in the workplace and the importance of equal employment opportunities.
The lawsuit stems from an incident where a pregnant woman applied for a hair braider position at the college, which operates both a barber shop and a school in Dallas.
According to the EEOC, the applicant successfully completed a skills test with satisfactory results. However, the situation took an unexpected turn when the company’s owner allegedly informed the applicant that they already had a pregnant employee and did not want two pregnant women at their school.
The EEOC claims that Dallas Barber and Stylist College expressed reluctance to deal with the applicant’s “condition,” referring to her pregnancy. This alleged conduct is a clear violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on sex, including discrimination related to pregnancy.
Bradley Anderson, EEOC Birmingham District Director, emphasized the legal requirement for employers to provide women equal opportunities to enter the workforce, regardless of their pregnancy status. He stated, “The EEOC is ready to defend victims of pregnancy discrimination.”
Marsha Rucker, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Birmingham District, reinforced this stance, saying, “Federal law guarantees all employees equal employment opportunity regardless of their sex or pregnancy status. As the federal agency charged with enforcing Title VII, the EEOC will take employers to task when they discriminate against workers because of pregnancy.”
The EEOC filed the lawsuit (EEOC v. Dallas Barber and Stylist College, Incorporated, case no. 3:24-cv-02296-S) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas after unsuccessful attempts to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its administrative conciliation process.
This case reminds employers of the importance of fair hiring practices and the legal protections for pregnant women in the workforce. It also underscores the EEOC’s commitment to enforcing these protections and ensuring equal opportunities for all job applicants, regardless of their pregnancy status.
As this case progresses, it will likely draw attention to the ongoing issue of pregnancy discrimination in the workplace and may serve as a catalyst for further discussions on equal employment opportunities.
Be Audit-Secure!
Lisa Smith, SPHR, SCP
Note: This blog post is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Always consult with a legal professional for advice specific to your situation.
Here is what all you will get:
- Boss Calls™ – Access to EVERY Boss Call™ – Past & Future.
- HelpDesk for HR VAULT – Access to all 8 of our proprietary tools and applications to make your workday simple.
- Forms, Docs, Policies and Procedures Library – 700+ samples you can download and edit to fit your needs.
- U.S. ePoster Club – Download state, city, and local posters. Both required & recommended, for all 50 states & D.C.
- Same-day email support – Write to our team of SPHR and SCP professionals with all your HR questions.
