Over the past few years, the practice of rounding in employee timekeeping has been a hot topic of discussion. While the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) allows employers to set rounding protocols, a recent judgment by a federal appeals court has reignited the controversy surrounding these practices. Specifically, in the case of *Houston v. St. Luke’s Health System*, there is doubt as to whether the rounding methods used by St. Luke’s Health System balanced out in the long run. This case underscores the necessity for companies to frequently review rounding processes to stay compliant with the FLSA.
The claim against St. Luke’s Health System originated from an employee who believed the organization’s rounding techniques were in breach of the FLSA. As per the legal records, St. Luke’s rounded clock-in and clock-out times to the nearest scheduled shift time if it was within a six-minute range. As an instance, if an employee began work at 8:56 a.m. for a shift scheduled at 9:00 a.m., the four minutes would not be compensated. Conversely, logging out at 4:54 p.m. for a 5:00 p.m. shift would result in payment for the full six minutes.
Although a federal district court initially sided with the employer, believing the strategy was unbiased, the decision was contested by the employee. This led the 8th Circuit to reconsider the case.
Upon review, the 8th Circuit identified potential non-neutrality in St. Luke’s Health System’s rounding policy. Evidence indicated that the policy might have consistently led to underpayment. A detailed analysis showed shifts being rounded down about half of the time, increased only a third of the time, and left unchanged in remaining instances.
An expert testified that the rounding procedure benefited St. Luke’s Health System by roughly 74,000 work hours, translating into an underpayment surpassing $2 million, when combining both FLSA and state law considerations. The court observed that the majority of employees were disadvantaged by this rounding practice, casting doubts on its fairness over a period.
The *Houston v. St. Luke’s Health System* ruling holds weighty consequences for businesses employing rounding in their timekeeping. Although the FLSA does allow for rounding, it mandates certain conditions to ensure fairness. A primary requirement is that rounding should not result in systemic undercompensation.
Furthermore, with the rise of electronic tracking systems, the court emphasized that it’s now simpler for companies to check for compliance with the FLSA, negating the need for obsolete tools like punch cards. Legal specialists in employment matters recommend regular audits for those using rounding practices to ensure that they remain just and comply with FLSA standards. Constant monitoring can prevent possible lawsuits and penalties.
The verdict in *Houston v. St. Luke’s Health System* acts as a prompt for companies to meticulously assess their rounding processes in light of FLSA compliance. The FLSA may allow rounding, but it must result in equitable compensation. Modern digital tracking tools make precise timekeeping easier, doing away with traditional, cumbersome methods. With diligent audits, businesses can confidently adhere to FLSA standards and avoid complications arising from rounding practices.
Be Audit-Secure™!
Lisa Smith, SPHR, SCP
Sign-up HERE and Save $170!
Here is what all you will get:
- Boss Calls™ – Access to EVERY Boss Call™ – Past & Future.
- HelpDesk for HR VAULT – Access to all 8 of our proprietary tools and applications to make your workday simple.
- Forms, Docs, Policies and Procedures Library – 700+ samples you can download and edit to fit your needs.
- U.S. ePoster Club – Download state, city, and local posters. Both required & recommended, for all 50 states & D.C.
- Same-day email support – Write to our team of SPHR and SCP professionals with all your HR questions.
